close
close
Harris and the Times, Trump and the tabloid press

Tabloid vs. NYT and WSJ

After watching the recent presidential debate, I have come to the conclusion that the days when we could align the presidential candidates with one of the two major national newspapers, the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal, are over.

Barack Obama was the New York Times, George W. Bush was the Wall Street Journal, Dwight Eisenhower was the Journal, JFK was the Times.

The debacle of a debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump showed that Harris' answers were just a logical imitation of the New York Times. Unfortunately, Trump's answers were more reminiscent of a terrible tabloid like the National Enquirer.

In fact, parts of Trump's appearance could just as easily have been mistaken for the satirical magazine Onion or, worse, the deliberately humorous Babylon Bee, whose motto is: “The definitive source for fake news you can trust.”

As a lifelong conservative, I have always voted for the candidate who most closely reflected the views of the Wall Street Journal. If I have the choice between the New York Times and a fake news tabloid in 2024, I will either vote for the NYT or stay home.

Lonnie Barham, Warwick

Public education too dependent on property taxes

Education and local property taxes are closely intertwined. I think all parties or stakeholders in the school funding debate need to work together more than ever to address the continued reliance on property taxes for the majority of public education funding. We are approaching the quarter mark of this century. It is time to act.

This is probably especially important for our smaller towns with limited financial resources and political influence. The Rhode Island State Constitution requires state legislators to support education. Those running for that body should explain what that means for them and other candidates in November.

Scott Bill Hirst, Ashaway

Necessary: ​​a strong foreign policy

The greatest geopolitical catastrophe for this country has occurred in the last two years under the Biden administration. This catastrophe is the convergence of China, Russia, North Korea and Iran, all pursuing a common goal.

Senator Jack Reed said: “We are in the most dangerous period in the country’s recent history.”

The way forward is to promote a strong foreign policy, and the Harris administration can never achieve that. Do you want another four years of ineffective foreign policy?

Joyce M. Stanczyk, Bradford

By Vanessa

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *